Far from the Madding Crowd by Thomas Hardy

Far from the Madding Crowd by Thomas Hardy

I just can’t be getting on with Hardy, mainly because his characters and storylines swing between dull or melodramatic. He never can seem to navigate successfully between the two in order to weave a compelling narrative as George Eliot does. Though not complete contemporaries, the comparison is an interesting one. Eliot’s characters are so subtle and deep; on the other hand Hardy’s are rather one dimensional, defined by one flaw or tendency. Gabriel Oak needs a lot more development to be plausible as a central character. Sergeant Troy at least avoids becoming a stage villain. And Bathsheba’s pride just isn’t enough to make a sufficiently well-rounded character to carry the novel. Bathsheba is not a patch on Eliot’s heroines. Why has Eliot’s 1872 work Middlemarch been described by many authors as the greatest novel in the English language? And how does Hardy’s best compare?

Mr A

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s